Love and scandal are the best sweeteners of tea. —Henry Fielding
Showing posts with label joachim trier. Show all posts
Showing posts with label joachim trier. Show all posts

28 January 2026

Oscar Nominations 2025: Post 1 of 10

Every year I post about each of the films nominated for Oscars—this year there are 35 features plus 15 short films (exactly the same as last year). Usually, I see all of them except for the documentaries (I am just not that interested in documentary film; I'm not sure why), but I'm also going to do myself a favor and skip the live-action short films. As a group they tend to be terrible every single year, and then for some reason the worst one usually manages to win.

This year with the enormous amount of political turmoil in our country and the ascendance of fascism in the U.S., it feels so stupid to be posting about movies. And for that I apologize. The state is murdering its own citizens in the streets, and I'm here to talk about Diane Warren... it's frivolous; I admit. But I write about politics in other places—I write about state violence, prison, racism, homophobia, and torture—and we all need an occasional break from thinking about the end of US American democracy. (Fucking gerrymandering, by the way, is anti-democratic; the fact that we just accept it as a political exigency is totally absurd. People should be represented in the government. The United States purports to be a government by the people and for the people. I live in a district that has been so viciously and cynically gerrymandered that I have no representation in Congress. It's a helpless state of affairs that serves the self interest of a political ruling class instead of the people.) 

In any case, I'm gonna post about the Oscars as usual. It makes me feel less alone, and crossing these movies off my list makes me feel like I can accomplish something in a state where I am nearly powerless because of the corruption of my government.

This is a good year. I will have more to say about this as we go through the nominees, but the Academy did really well this year, I think. My top ten for 2025 looks much closer to the Academy's than last year, and part of the reason for that is that the Academy's nominees look much more international than usual. This is due to the much more international Academy—an excellent state of affairs. My own list is always going to veer more international than the Academy's, and it's always going to be a good deal gayer, too, but that's a whole other story.

One thing I fundamentally believe, however, is that the Oscars are a jumping-off point for discussion rather than the final word on anything... So let's discuss!

I will go film by film discussing each movie individually rather than by category—beginning with the movies most beloved by the Academy this year. If the nominee has been nominated for Oscars previously, their previous nominations will be listed next to their name in parentheses. This year's nominees are:

Sinners
16 nominations
  • Picture
  • Director: Ryan Coogler (1st time nominee)
  • Actor: Michael B. Jordan  (1st time nominee)
  • Original Screenplay: Coogler (1st time nominee)
  • Supporting Actor: Delroy Lindo (1st time nominee)
  • Supporting Actress: Wunmi Mosaku (1st time nominee)
  • Film Editing: Michael P. Shawver (1st time nominee)
  • Cinematography: Autumn Durald Arkapaw (1st time nominee)
  • Production Design: Hannah Beachler (Black Panther) & Monique Champagne (1st time nominee)
  • Original Score: Ludwig Göransson (Oppenheimer, Black Panther)
  • Costume Design: Ruth E. Carter (Black Panther: Wakanda Forever, Black Panther, Amistad, Malcolm X)
  • Casting
  • Sound
  • Visual Effects
  • Makeup & Hairstyling
  • Original Song – "I Lied to You": Göransson (Black Panther: Wakanda Forever) & Raphael Saadiq (Mudbound)
Director: Coogler
Cast: Jordan, Miles Caton, Hailee Steinfeld, Jack O'Connell, Mosaku, Jayme Lawson, Omar Benson Miller, Lindo, Li Jun Li, Yao, Lola Kirke, Peter Dreimanis

This is a record-breaking number of nominations, as I'm sure you've heard by now. Part of the reason for this is the new Oscar category for casting, but more important is that Sinners garnered nominations in all the below the line categories as well as its three acting nominations. This is is an unusual state of affairs. More typically, a film that everyone loves will do great below the line (think Avatar or The Fellowship of the Ring) without having any real support from the acting branch. In fact, this is what most everyone expected of Sinners but then here we are, and it crushed the competition on the morning of the nominations. I loved this movie, and I think it deserves all of its accolades. It's a bit of an unusual fit for Oscar, but I think what Ryan Coogler has proved so beautifully is how rich a genre picture can be. This is a full-out vampire revenge adventure–suspense thing. It's a delight from start to finish, and yet it feels like a prestige picture, even though its main goal is entertainment. This is is Coogler's incredible strength as a filmmaker, and I'm here for it. Most of the film's nominees are first-timers—including Delroy Lindo, Michael B. Jordan, and Coogler himself. The old-timers here are Ruth Carter and Ludwig Göransson, both winning previously for another Coogler film. I can't say enough good things about this movie. It's not the Academy's normal fare, but I'm so glad it's here. For this reason, and because of this enormous, record-breaking shakeup, I think this movie is going to pull ahead and win Best Picture.
Will win: Picture, Original Screenplay, Score, Costume Design
Could win: Director, Actor, Editing, Casting
My rating: #5 out of 88

One Battle after Another
13 nominations
  • Picture
  • Director: Paul Thomas Anderson (Licorice Pizza, Phantom Thread, There Will Be Blood)
  • Actor: Leonardo DiCaprio (Once upon a Time... in Hollywood, The Revenant, The Wolf of Wall Street, Blood Diamond, The Aviator, What's Eating Gilbert Grape)
  • Adapted Screenplay: Anderson (Licorice Pizza, Inherent Vice, There Will Be Blood, Magnolia, Boogie Nights)
  • Supporting Actor: Sean Penn (Milk, Mystic River, I Am Sam, Sweet and Lowdown, Dead Man Walking)
  • Supporting Actor: Benicio del Toro (21 Grams, Traffic)
  • Supporting Actress: Teyana Taylor (1st time nominee)
  • Film Editing: Andy Jurgensen (1st time nominee)
  • Cinematography: Michael Bauman (1st time nominee)
  • Production Design: Anthony Carlino (Babylon) & Florencia Martin (Babylon)
  • Original Score: Jonny Greenwood (The Power of the Dog, Phantom Thread)
  • Casting
  • Sound
Director: Anderson
Cast: DiCaprio, Chase Infiniti, Penn, Del Toro, Taylor, Regina Hall, Wood Harris, Tony Goldwyn, D.W. Moffett

This has been the frontrunner for many months, and it probably still is the frontrunner—the love it received from the acting branch is evidence of that. It's also just flat out great, though this film, like Sinners, is also basically a genre picture. This is a shoot out, action–comedy thing that feels very unlike, in the first place, a film that the Academy would normally like and, in the second place, unlike a typical Paul Thomas Anderson film. (The truth is, though, that Anderson surprises us constantly, switching without any seeming effort between comedies and very serious art-house fare.) This is one of my favorite movies of the year, and I think its timeliness (the fascist cops on the street rounding up protestors and trying to find immigrants) makes this movie feel like it just understood the year 2025 in a way that doesn't usual seem possible in the cinema. My main gripe about this film is that the white supremacists in it are too silly. It is true that white supremacists are absurd, of course, but they're also deadly, and because Anderson's film is a comedy with a very silly group of white supremacists as its chief antagonists, it feels like it doesn't quite take this fascist agenda quite as seriously as it ought to. I expect this to do very well on Oscar night. I don't think it will win Best Picture anymore, but I think Anderson will and should win Best Director. It's his fourth nomination, and he's earned it.
Will win: Director, Adapted Screenplay, Supporting Actress 
Could win: Picture, Actor, Film Editing, Score, Casting
My rating: #3 out of 88

Affeksjonsverdi (Sentimental Value)
9 nominations
  • Picture
  • Director: Joachim Trier (1st time nominee)
  • Actress: Renate Reinsve (1st time nominee)
  • Original Screenplay: Trier (The Worst Person in the World) & Eskil Vogt (The Worst Person in the World)
  • Supporting Actor: Stellan Skarsgård (1st time nominee)
  • Supporting Actress: Elle Fanning (1st time nominee)
  • Supporting Actress: Inga Ibsdotter Illeaas (1st time nominee)
  • Film Editing: Olivier Bugge Coutté (1st time nominee)
  • International Picture: Norway (The Worst Person in the World, Kon-Tiki, Elling, The Other Side of Sunday, Pathfinder, Nine Lives: the Story of Jan Baalsrud)
Director: Joachim Trier
Cast: Reinsve, Skarsgård, Illeaas, Fanning, Andreas Stoltenberg Granerud, Øyvind Hesjedal Loven, Anders Danielsen Lie, Cory Michael Smith, Catherine Cohen

This movie is so good. It’s about family in a way that is decidedly unsentimental, despite its title, and it gets at ties between family members that don’t really make sense but repeat or resurface. It’s about trying to tell a story or find the words for feelings or intuitions that don’t have words for them. In many ways, it's also a movie about a house, or at least it tells its story from the perspective of the house. It's a brilliant stroke of writing. I am sorry that Joachim Trier standby Anders Danielsen Lie's part was too small to sneak him a Best Supporting Actor nomination (and Stellan Skarsgård is decidedly committing category fraud running as a supporting actor). The fact that this did so well with the Academy is wonderful Trier has been making excellent (maybe even perfect) movies for a long time, and it's great that people are catching up to that! I don't think this can win anything on the big night except Supporting Actor (although it may also get International Feature). But almost everyone here is a first-time nominee, and they're all gonna just be happy to be there. 
Will win: Supporting Actor
Could win: Original Screenplay, Editing, International Feature
My rating: #10 out of 88

18 March 2022

Oscar Nominations 2021: 5 of 9

1. The Power of the Dog, Dune, Belfast, and West Side Story
 
Tick, Tick... Boom!
2 Nominations
  • Actor: Andrew Garfield (Hacksaw Ridge)
  • Film Editing
Cast: Garfield, Alexandra Shipp, Robin de Jesus, Vanessa Hudgens, Joshua Henry, Jonathan Marc Sherman, MJ Rodriguez, Judith Light, Bradley Whitford, Ben Levi Ross

I was stunned that I liked this as much as I did, but, listen: Tick, Tick... Boom! was the best musical of the year, followed closely by Belle and Encanto. What's amazing about this is that Belle and Encanto are animated films and Tick, Tick... Boom! isn't, although it does have some cool fantasy sequences – that work well and lean into the theatricality of the piece. It's a pretty stunning achievement, honestly, and I'm glad Garfield has shown up here. He's just great in this. The film editing nod from the editors branch means that they thought it was the best musical of the year, too. Musical films win in this category every once in a while – Bohemian Rhapsody, Whiplash, Slumdog Millionaire – but this movie is just happy to be at the ceremony, I think. It's a small scale movie of a minor musical theatre piece, but Miranda, Garfield, and company knocked it out of the park.
Will Win: N/A
Could Win: N/A
My Rating: #11 out of 58

Parallel Mothers (Madres Paralelas)
2 Nominations
  • Actress: Penélope Cruz (Nine, Vicky Christina Barcelona, Volver)
  • Score: Alberto Iglesias (Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, The Kite Runner, The Constant Gardener)
Director: Pedro Almodóvar
Cast: Cruz, Milena Smit, Israel Elejalde, Aitana Sánchez-Gijón, Rossy de Palma

I loved this movie, but I didn't write about it when it came out. It seemed to demand a little too academic of an analysis from me, and I was really busy that month. But here goes: I know a lot of people have had trouble making sense of the first section and last section, which are very seriously about genocide in Spain, and the long middle section, which is sexy and pulpy and brazenly melodramatic. But here's the thing. Melodrama is about the dividedness we experience in side the self. The very purpose of melodrama is to speak about how none of us is single. We are simply not one. Coupling is impossible in melodrama because we are already not one and so we can never be two. We are divided. Our loyalties are split – as Janis's loyalties are split between love for Spain and love for her father, between love for her lover and love for motherhood as such, between her love for Ana and her love for Arturo. But also the question of the pulpy melodrama at the center of Parallel Mothers is a question of paternity/maternity. What does it mean to build a legacy? To have a child? To love it? To want it to last longer? And then to want also to draw back on those in the past. The parallel mothers are, in many ways, all those mothers in the village, raising their children on their own in the fatherless town. The final, gorgeous, heartbreaking shot of Parallel Mothers brings these two plots together flawlessly. This could be your father. This could be your lover. Fascism in Spain broke up the family line. It took babies out of the hands of their fathers. So, I think that what seems like tonal dissonance in this film is actually a perfect parallel.
Will Win: N/A
Could Win: N/A
My Rating: #7 out of 58

The Eyes of Tammy Faye
2 Nominations
  • Actress: Jessica Chastain (Zero Dark Thirty, The Help)
  • Makeup & Hairstyling
Cast: Chastain, Andrew Garfield, Cherry Jones, Vincent D'Onofrio, Sam Jaeger, Gabriel Olds, Mark Wystrach, Louis Cancelmi

This is a good enough movie, and I enjoyed myself quite a bit. It's also a rather gay movie, even though there are almost no gay characters. The whole thing just has a very gay sensibility. Jessica Chastain is excellent as Tammy Faye, and she manages to be nuanced and sensitive and give us a portrayal of Tammy Faye's depth as a human even when Tammy Faye herself is the shallow caricature we are seeing on television. It's pretty amazing actually, and she is the favorite to win best actress (although I am betting against her). Obviously, also, the Tammy Faye makeup is iconic, and so this film just had to be nominated in that category. It could potentially win that one too.
Will Win: N/A
Could Win: Actress, Makeup & Hairstyling
My Rating: #38 out of 58

The Worst Person in the World (Verdens Verste Menneske)
2 Nominations
  • Original Screenplay: Joachim Trier & Eskil Vogt
  • International Feature: Norway (Kon-Tiki, Elling, The Other Side of Sunday, Ofelaš (Pathfinder), Nine Lives: the Story of Jan Baalsrud)
Director: Joachim Trier
Cast: Renate Reinsve, Anders Danielsen Lie, Herbert Nordrum, Hans Olav Brenner, Helene Bjørnebye, Vidar Sandem

This is another one of the best movies of the year. I'm telling you: the Academy got a lot right this year. This deserves both of its nominations and actually a bunch more. The three main acting performances are extraordinary, with Renate Reinsve leading the pack. I defy you not to fall in love with her. She's incredible. I love Joachim Trier's movies; I think he has deep insights into human behavior, and this film is no exception. There are just extraordinarily wise sections of this film that ask you to think deeply about your own choices and what you're willing to risk. It's so good. I recommend that you see this movie, and I am not one to recommend movies, usually. But The Worst Person in the World is sexy and funny and wise and dynamic and heartbreaking all at once.
Will Win: N/A
Could Win: N/A
My Rating: #2 out of 58

18 January 2018

Thelma

Thelma felt sort of cliché. I wanted to love it because I love Joachim Trier, but this movie seemed like a retread of X-Men and Raw, and not in a good way. It's basic message is that you have to kill your parents, and, like, I already know that, so I'm gonna need this film to come up with something better.

Also, maybe it is the atheism talking, but when I'm watching a character have an interior struggle that involves religion vs. queerness I get bored very quickly. This is because I know that if religion wins out your movie has a serious problem. And so I know that religion isn't going to win out. This isn't just a plot problem – although it is a plot problem, because there are not really any stakes – it's also a problem of my own interests. I am just not interested in religion: in queer people's religion, in straight people's religion, in Christianity, in Islam, in Judaism, in any of them. I just don't care. I know that a lot of people do care, but I am not one of them. If I had known Thelma was in the least bit about a young woman's struggle between queer desire and Christianity, I would have passed on it.

But, Joachim Trier, I still love you!