My Beloved J.Lo. I would have nominated you! |
What people are not asking for is something interesting. In other words, I don't hear anyone complaining that Mati Diop or Céline Sciamma were passed over in the Best Director category or that Rob Morgan and Sterling K. Brown were ignored for Best Supporting Actor.
To put it another way, Academy voters are choosing between their favorites of the thirty movies that the studios told them were important and asked them to care about. They're watching the screeners they're sent and not thinking beyond that group of films. This is an abysmal state of affairs to be sure. But then all of these commentators on the Internet are doing the exact same thing.
Zhao Tao in Ash Is Purest White |
And so... I have some (serious) challenges for anyone complaining about the Academy's favorite things this year:
Challenge One:
Forget the white folks altogether! Name twenty actors of color who you would have nominated for Best Actress, Best Actor, Best Supporting Actress, and Best Supporting Actor for 2019.
Challenge Two:
Name five films made primarily in a language other than English that you would have nominated for Best International Feature. You don't have to choose from the submission list – most of those films haven't been released in the U.S. yet. Just choose five really good foreign language films that you loved this year.
Challenge Three:
Watch only films and television directed by women for three months.
Of course, you're free to complain about what the Academy likes; we all are. That's part of the pleasure of the Academy's choices. We can all bitch about why they're wrong and who would've been better choices. But what we all need is better cinema. We all need to watch more stories about black people, people of color, women, and trans people. We should all be watching more foreign cinema. And we can really only expect the Academy to be better if we're better.
No comments:
Post a Comment