Love and scandal are the best sweeteners of tea. —Henry Fielding

31 May 2014

Our Town

The show I am co-directing this summer is an outdoor production of Thornton Wilder's Our Town that will be performed in two separate location in Lynchburg's Old City Cemetery. This commercial will be running in local Central Virginia markets:


Much of my own thinking about the show has been informed by the letters of Thornton Wilder, Gertrude Stein, and Alice Toklas. Reading about the history of their friendship has changed much about how I've thought about the relationships in Our Town. I've also been reading Thoreau's Walden; or, Life in the Woods and, of course, Seneca. It is hard, now that I've read almost all of Proust's À la Recherche to avoid relating things to Proust or through Proust. So much of this has informed my ideas about the show. It seems sort of obvious that I also spend a lot of time thinking about Wilder's other work, particularly his short plays The Wreck on the Five-twenty-five, The Long Christmas Dinner, And the Sea Shall Give Up Its Dead, and The Angel that Troubled the Waters.


I wanted to share some of my thoughts about the show here, since it is so much in my thoughts.

At one point, the stage manager refers to the fact that the only thing we still have from ancient Babylon are wheat contracts and contracts for the sale of slaves. Every time I hear it, this mention of wheat contracts makes me think of a poem by Jack Gilbert called “The Forgotten Dialect of the Heart”:

How astonishing it is that language can almost mean,
and frightening that it does not quite. Love, we say,
God, we say, Rome and Michiko, we write, and the words
Get it wrong. We say bread and it means according
to which nation. French has no word for home,
and we have no word for strict pleasure. A people
in northern India is dying out because their ancient
tongue has no words for endearment. I dream of lost
vocabularies that might express some of what
we no longer can. Maybe the Etruscan texts would
finally explain why the couples on their tombs
are smiling. And maybe not. When the thousands
of mysterious Sumerian tablets were translated,
they seemed to be business records. But what if they
are poems or psalms? My joy is the same as twelve
Ethiopian goats standing silent in the morning light.
O Lord, thou art slabs of salt and ingots of copper,
as grand as ripe barley lithe under the wind's labor.
Her breasts are six white oxen loaded with bolts
of long-fibered Egyptian cotton. My love is a hundred
pitchers of honey. Shiploads of thuya are what
my body wants to say to your body. Giraffes are this
desire in the dark. Perhaps the spiral Minoan script
is not a language but a map. What we feel most has
no name but amber, archers, cinnamon, horses and birds.

And stars. Stars come up so much in Our Town. At the cemetery, certainly, the stage manager and many of the dead speak about the stars, but all through the play the stars are singled out for mention by Wilder. I told the cast during a meeting that because the stars are our ancestors perhaps we are all just little pieces of star, and that maybe this gets mentioned so often as a way for Wilder to link us all to a larger history that exists before humanity itself. In the Consolation to Helvia 8.6, Seneca offers us the following thought in relation to his exile from Rome to the island of Corsica:  

So long as I may observe so many stars gleaming through the night – some fixed, others not voyaging forth over a great distance but circling around their own given area, some suddenly bursting forth, others dazzling our eyes with spreading fire as if they were falling, or flying by with a long trail of brilliant light; so long as I may commune with these and, so far as a human can, mingle with things divine, and so long as I may keep my mind always striving to contemplate the kindred objects on high – what difference does it make to me what ground I tread.

I love this thought, And here is an additional one, from a poem by Mary Oliver called "Stars":

Here in my head, language
keeps making its tiny noises.

How can I hope to be friends
with the hard white stars

whose flaring and hissing are not speech
but pure radiance?

How can I hope to be friends
with the yawning spaces between them

where nothing, ever, is spoken?
Tonight, at the edge of the field,

I stood very still, and looked up,
and tried to be empty of words.

What joy was it, that almost found me?
What amiable peace?

Then it was over, the wind
roused up in the oak trees behind me

and I fell back, easily.
Earth has a hundred thousand pure contraltos—

even the distant night bird
as it talks threat, as it talks love

over the cold, black fields.
Once, deep in the woods,

I found the white skull of a bear
and it was utterly silent—

and once a river otter, in a steel trap,
and it too was utterly silent.

What can we do
but keep on breathing in and out,

modest and willing, and in our places?
Listen, listen, I'm forever saying,

Listen to the river, to the hawk, to the hoof,
to the mockingbird, to the jack-in-the-pulpit—

then I come up with a few words, like a gift.
Even as now.

Even as the darkness has remained the pure, deep darkness.
Even as the stars have twirled a little, while I stood here,

looking up,
one hot sentence after another.

And lastly, in the play itself Wilder refers to Edgar Lee Masters' poem "Lucinda Matlock" from the Spoon River Anthology. His poem is also worth reading because it seems to me to encompass the whole play:

I went to the dances at Chandlerville,
And played snap-out at Winchester.
One time we changed partners,
Driving home in the moonlight of middle June,
And then I found Davis.
We were married and lived together for seventy years,
Enjoying, working, raising the twelve children,
Eight of whom we lost
Ere I had reached the age of sixty.
I spun, I wove, I kept the house, I nursed the sick,
I made the garden, and for holiday
Rambled over the fields where sang the larks,
And by Spoon River gathering many a shell,
And many a flower and medicinal weed—
Shouting to the wooded hills, singing to the green valleys.
At ninety-six I had lived enough, that is all,
And passed to a sweet repose.
What is this I hear of sorrow and weariness,
Anger, discontent and drooping hopes?
Degenerate sons and daughters,
Life is too strong for you—
It takes life to love Life.

24 May 2014

Monsters and Saviors

I don't normally post a giant poster here, but, like, it's Godzilla, and he/she is one huge motherfucker. In fact, my friends and I were trying to compare Godzilla to the size of a Tyrannosaurus or a Stegosaurus and, well, they are not really comparable to Gojira him/herself. This is one enormous monster.

This movie is enormous too. In fact, that is really the most important thing to say about this movie. About six minutes of it are really, really cool. The rest of the movie is intensely frustrating. Director Gareth Edwards shows us about 3 or 4 seconds of great action at a time, and then absolutely insists on cutting away from exactly the thing that the audience wants to see. This tactic happens about 25 times (I swear I am not exaggerating), and it started to drive me crazy after about the 5th time. The whole time I was thinking why isn't he letting me watch his movie? He has hidden an awesome six-minute flick within this two hour monstrosity and gives us just a little bit of awesomeness at a time.

All of this is further complicated by the really boring family at the middle of the film. I really like both Aaron Taylor-Johnson and Elizabeth Olsen, but they were both lifeless in this – staring wide-eyed and soullessly into Seamus McGarvey's camera – and waiting for something to happen. And I was too.

The original Gojira
Godzilla him/herself is, of course, totally awesome. Just totally awesome. I could have watched her/him swim around the Pacific and walk around Hawaii/San Francisco/Tokyo and eat radiation and knock buildings over with that tail for at least 40 minutes. Maybe that's gonna be in the sequel...? It sure wasn't in this movie.

There isn't much else to say, I guess, except that I was totally annoyed by the absurdly heterosexist gendering of the other monsters in the movie (they're called MUTOs). The only thing this "female" monster cares about is reproducing, and she lays her eggs (I am not sure how the eggs are fertilized or anything like that, and the film doesn't bother to try to explain that), and then she leaves them just hanging around, but then when the eggs are destroyed, the screenwriters have her keen over her unborn young in this bizarre way. The whole thing made me cringe.

And they made Godzilla into this weird Christ figure, sacrificing her/himself in order to save the world. Sacrifice is all good and well, but the film "says" that Gojira is a kind of embodiment of nature itself. In other words, he/she should actually be rather indifferent about humanity per se.

Oh, I know what else there is to say: I've seen Guillermo Del Toro's Pacific Rim (which I really liked and reviewed here), so basically the whole time I was watching this Gojira reboot I was just wondering why they even tried. Pacific Rim already did this right.

27 April 2014

Divergent

A few small thoughts on Neil Burger's Divergent.

Neil Burger previously directed the terrible film The Illusionist (which, incidentally, does have a beautiful score by Philip Glass).

But Divergent is very good, and the more I think about it the more I like it.

Comparisons with The Hunger Games are inevitable – girl-power, dystopias, vaguely anti-Fascistic politics, highly structured class systems, color-coding, young-adult-novel-as-source – but Divergent is way way way better than The Hunger Games. For one, the young woman at the center of Divergent's narrative does a lot of choosing, seems to have a purchase on the decisions that she makes, and basically becomes a total badass on her own.

Divergent also lacks the intense sentimentality of HG, opting instead for a character who favors rational decision-making, an understanding of power structures combined with a savvy ability to work within them, and a political knowledge more complex than a notion of "good guys" and "bad guys".

As a film, Divergent also gives us plenty of time to take in the beauty of the world in which it is situated. The central character (her name is Tris – rhymes with Katniss – and she is similarly saddled with a less-cartoonish but still vaguely symbolic last name; hers is Prior) enjoys the world in which she lives, finds parts of it beautiful, and treats it with respect and affection. And it isn't just the film's protagonist who enjoys her world, the filmmaker, too, takes a great pleasure in the world that surrounds Tris.

Unlike the heroine of HG, Tris, who (like Katniss) is, of course, forced to respond to the military power and governmental violence that are brought to bear upon her, but Tris responds actively, dominating her surroundings, leading the other people in her life, and enjoying the victories that she wins. Divergent is not a film with a series of bad choices, wherein the heroine must opt for the lesser of a series of evils. Divergent resounds with a hopefulness for a future where the world might be better. If, finally, we are given no image of what that world might look like, we are given an image of a young woman who is prepared to work hard to make a world in which she would like to live.

Divergence, as an idea, is a happy metaphor for queerness, for the idea of a person who doesn't fit in who feels alone and then finds a community of others who diverge similarly. It may be that I liked the film for this reason most of all, and then am tacking on my other ideas as the result of this identificatory process. Or it may be that the lovely Shailene Woodley simply smiles a good deal more than the for-some-reason-always-serious Jennifer Lawrence.

In any case, sequels are scheduled, and I will definitely be seeing the second one of these.

03 April 2014

Don Jon

I have to say that I am sort of irritated by how, well, not good Joseph Gordon-Levitt's first feature is.

I don't even think I have a lot to say about this film except that it is basically Ted except for instead of an amusing (well, not that amusing) talking bear, JGL's version of the man-child who doesn't want to grow up has a laptop and some pornography to keep him company.

One thing that Ted has on Don Jon, too, is that Ted has a woman at its center who is actually correct about how to improve the man in her life. Don Jon's version of that is a shallow, idiotic rich girl who literally doesn't approve of speaking out loud about purchasing cleaning products in Target in case someone hears you. I mean this film hates its central female character.

Don Jon isn't without its merits. JGL is hard to dislike. How could anyone? He is clearly a lovely performer, and the picture is decently made – it is his first, and its a lot better than, well, other actors' first features.

And the film makes some really good points, too. Carl's Jr. ads really are pornographic, and this film calls them out on it. Romantic comedies, too, get some women off in the same way that pornographic films get some men off. It is a pleasing comparison: one that basically erases the history of oppression and misogyny to which women have been subjected through the dehumanization of pornographic imagery, but not incorrect.

Here's the deal: this is a film with the tagline There's more to life than a happy ending. A pornographic pun, to be sure. And the film promises to be irreverent, to be relatively sexy/pornographic, and then to end without a happy ending: something at the very least non-normative. But it doesn't know how to do that.

There is not more to life than a happy ending in this film. It is a film with a very earnest message that made me want to throw something. It purports to know how to have sex correctly – the true way to enjoy sex with someone (in case you weren't aware) is really to see someone else, to share something, to make love. I mean, look, I'm glad that is good for some people, and I am not saying that that's, like, a bad way to have sex or anything, but to behave as though the way that you like to have sex is somehow the correct way to do it, seems... well, I'll be generous and say: a bit short sighted.


And Don Jon is totally invested in its main character learning exactly this lesson. In fact, like other recent comedies about grown men turning into adults and leaving their childhoods behind (Knocked Up, The Forty-Year-Old Virgin, Ted), Don Jon links growing up or "becoming a man" to something very specific that the film argues is "what adults do". In the case of Don Jon, "what adults do" is watch less porn than they did when they were teens/kids/whatever. And they make love with the women with whom they have sex: they don't simply engage in "one-sided" sex.

This is all fine, I suppose. I jut don't relate to this kind of thing in any way.

Maybe I need to grow up and start having sex the "right" way. Paging Dr. Freud.

13 March 2014

The Wolverine

Don't confuse The Wolverine with X-men Origins: Wolverine, although, well, I guess it wouldn't matter too much if you did.
This poster is awesome.

I insist on seeing these X-men movies, and I am not really sure why. I guess it is out of queer solidarity. Mutant powers are an obvious (and useful) metaphor for deviant sexuality, certainly, and then there are all of the gay people in the movies. Which is fun. But most of these X-men movies have, frankly, not been very good, so I am not sure why I am as loyal as I am to the franchise. In any case, I couldn't bring myself actually to see The Wolverine in the theatre when it was out, but now that Oscar season is over, I rented The Wolverine. Oh yeah, and this isn't the sequel either to the 2009 Origins: Wolverine film or the 2011 X-men: First Class. This movie is a follow-up to X-men: the Last Stand (i.e. X-men 3), which came out 7 years ago. I, frankly, couldn't remember anything that happened, but apparently I saw it back in 2006 because I blogged about it back then.

This movie is bad. Honestly, though, I still kinda liked it. First off, this film takes place in Japan and is filled with every single movie cliché that Hollywood has ever churned out about the "land of the rising sun" and about Japanese people in general. These include:
  • women pouring tea (and I don't mean sharing gossip)
  • women cooking for men
  • samurai swords (a lot of them)
  • the phrase: "Chopsticks standing up are a bad omen. Everything has meaning."
  • 10th century wall hangings
  • the word rōnin, which is used multiple times
  • the factoring of the bombing of Nagasaki into the plot
  • an outdoor winter scene (which is weird, because sometimes it's Spring in the film)
  • martial arts galore
  • nefarious businessmen (see the Christopher Nolan Batman reboot films for more villainous Asians)
  • a low-rent Japanese brothel
  • the Yakuza
  • the phrase: "I don't expect you to understand; you're not Japanese"
We even got the biggest Hollywood cliché of them all in films about Japan at the end. As he finally kills the bad guy for good, Hugh Jackman looks into the villain's eyes and says: Sayonara. Boom.

But there are a lot of good things, too: the villain is really cool. Actually, she is the hot blonde chic that exists in all Hollywood films about Japan. (There is always a hot, evil, blonde chick with whom we can contrast the naive, docile, but incredibly gorgeous Japanese woman, with whom the hero is supposed to fall in love.) But anyway, this blond villain, whose name is VENOM, is really cool.

Why wear a shirt? This guy is 45 years old and he looks amazing.
And Hugh Jackman is shirtless a lot, and he looks amazing. In fact, Hugh Jackman is shirtless so much that I started to wonder who this film's intended audience is. I mean, it is filmed like a silly movie for teenage boys (the violence is almost egregiously fake and cartoonish), but this film loves Hugh Jackman's body, and there is an extended sequence with a sexy Japanese guy in his underwear, too, and I couldn't really figure out why. Not that I'm complaining.

What else? I guess there isn't much else to say. We learn almost nothing about Logan or his origin, of course, and the acting is pretty terrible across the board except for the excellent Hiroyuki Sanada and a really great performance by Ken Yamamura.

Basically, this is for Hugh Jackman fans but pretty much nobody else. I take that back. Honestly, I'm not much of a Jackman fan, but I sure am a fan of his upper body. Woof.

01 March 2014

Oscar Nominees 2014: Part 14 of 14


Get a Horse!
1 Nomination
  • Animated Short Film
Director: Lauren MacMullan
Cast: Walt Disney, Marcellite Garner, Russi Taylor, Billy Bletcher, Will Ryan, Raymond S. Persi

I expect this to win as a sort of consensus choice. It is imaginative enough and inoffensive, and it taps into one of the Academy's favorite feelings: nostalgia. The film is nothing special, really, but it is fun, and charming in its way. Honestly, I have to admit to being slightly disturbed by the cartoon violence in this movie – this doesn't seem to have bothered too many people, but the violence that is perpetrated on the Peg Leg Pete character is done senselessly and in a troubling way. Peg Leg Pete is thrown around, stabbed, electrocuted, and sodomized by a pitchfork. He is obviously a violent character himself, intent on doing something to Minnie Mouse (is rape implied?), but the revenge taken by Mickey and co. doesn't seem warranted.
Will Win: Animated Short Film
Could Win: N/A
My Rating: Not ranked

Mr Hublot.
1 Nomination
  • Animated Short Film
Director: Laurent Witz

This is, I think, the most charming of the nominees. In a strange, dystopian, robot-populated future an introverted accountant with OCD (OCD is always charming at the movies, isn't it?) adopts a stray robot dog and develops a relationship with it. The animation is gorgeous, the story is charming, and the character design is impeccable. The film also has some really good jokes.
Will Win: N/A
Could Win: Animated Short Film
My Rating: Not ranked

Feral
1 Nomination
  • Animated Short Film
Director: Daniel Sousa

Feral is my favorite of these short films. It is a beautifully realized little story about a feral boy who is clothed and taken to the city, but who cannot quite be civilized – because civilization itself doesn't know how to be civil. The film is unrealistic in style, perhaps even surreal, and one wonders if the city is real, if the boy is real, if the snow is real. Or perhaps the boy is actually a wolf, or a bird, or a stag, or a leaf, or maybe he's a spirit of some sort, taking on the energy of the things he touches. This is a little mystery, but it doesn't ask its audience to figure it out; it asks for us only to go with it. And once we do, the film becomes about being, about personhood, about interacting with the world around us. Lovely.
Will Win: N/A
Could Win: N/A
My Rating: Not ranked

Room on the Broom
1 Nomination
  • Animated Short Film
Director: Max Lang, Jan Lachauer
Cast: Rob Brydon, Gillian Anderson, Simon Pegg, Timothy Spall, Martin Clunes, Sally Hawkins, David Walliams

Absolutely charming, this little story is about teamwork and sharing. There is a dragon – who is an enormous coward – and the most adorable animated cat since Antonio Banderas's puss in boots. (I seriously loved this animated cat, which is very strange since I don't much like cats in real life. This one has the best personality ever.) Quite frankly I expected not to like this one much – the animation simply isn't that interesting – but the story is charming, and the expressions on these animals' faces are just adorable.
Will Win: N/A
Could Win: Animated Short Film
My Rating: Not ranked

Possessions (ツクモ)
1 Nomination
  • Animated Short Film
Director: Shuhei Morita
Cast: Kōichi Yamadera, Aoi Yuki, Takeshi Kusao

Imaginative and fascinating, Possessions is a ghost story: a tale about forgotten or abandoned objects that have gotten old enough to acquire their own souls. They trap a traveling mechanic/salesman/tailor (whoever he is, this guy is ripped) in an abandoned cabin in the woods, and they play tricks on him until he can figure out how to be kind to them. It is an interesting little tale that is easier to make sense of once one understands it as a kind of kaidan.
Will Win: N/A
Could Win: N/A
My Rating: Not ranked

Oscar Predictions

The big awards are finally tomorrow. I hope you've seen as many of the films as you can. There are lots of real gems out there (La Grande Bellezza, Gravity, Her, and Before Midnight) are my favorites among the nominees. This is a year that is really hard to predict. It looks as though there are three frontrunners, and at any given moment, I feel like changing my predictions. So if the evening is full of surprises tomorrow (and I will be surprised even if my predictions work out), it might also end up being rather disappointing (if American Hustle starts taking home Oscars).

Anyway, we shall see! I plan to have lots of fun watching, and I'm working on a Gravity-themed cocktail for my guests.

Here are my Oscar predictions:

Best Picture: Gravity
Best Director: Cuarón, Gravity
Best Live-action Short: Helium
Best Animated Short: Get a Horse!

Best Song: "Let It Go", Frozen
Best Makeup: Dallas Buyers Club
Best Visual Effects: Gravity  
Best Sound Editing: Gravity  
Best Sound Mixing: Gravity

Best Foreign Language Picture: La Grande Bellezza
Best Documentary Short: The Lady in Number 6: Music Saved My Life
Best Documentary Feature: Twenty Feet from Stardom
Best Original Score: Steven Price, Gravity 
Best Costume Design: Catherine Martin, The Great Gatsby (Zzzzz. Can this please lose?)
Best Production Design: Catherine Martin, The Great Gatsby
Best Animated Feature: Frozen
Best Film Editing: Mark Sanger & Alfonso Cuarón, Gravity
Best Cinematography: Emmanuel Lubezki, Gravity
Best Supporting Actress: Lupita Nyong'o, 12 Years a Slave (I hope, I hope, I hope)
Best Supporting Actor: Jared Leto, Dallas Buyers Club
Best Original Screenplay: David O. Russell, American Hustle (A true shame, but I think it happens.)
Best Adapted Screenplay: John Ridley, 12 Years a Slave
Best Actress: Cate Blanchett, Blue Jasmine
Best Actor: Matthew McConaughey, Dallas Buyers Club

Happy Oscars, everyone.

28 February 2014

Oscar Nominees 2014: Part 13 of 14


The Wind Rises (風立ちぬ)
1 Nomination
  • Animated Feature
Director: Hayao Miyazaki
Cast: Hideaki Anno, Miori Takimoto, Hidetoshi Nishijima, Masahiko Nishimura, Stephen Alpert, Keiko Takeshita, Mirai Shida, Jun Kunimura, Shinobu Otake, Nomura Mansai (except that they all spoke English when I saw it, so: Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Emily Blunt, John Krasinski, Martin Short, Stanley Tucci, Werner Herzog, William H. Macy, Jennifer Grey)

This is apparently not going to be (as has been reported) Miyazaki's final film. We should all breathe a sigh of relief at this. The subject matter of The Wind Rises is not Miyazaki's usual fanciful content, so I was sort of worried that The Wind Rises wouldn't be as magical as his previous films. I oughtn't to have worried one bit. This is a film about an artist, and his visions of what he can create are told through beautiful, fanciful dreams that feel like nothing but magic. It is gorgeous. The score is beautiful (and really should've taken Philomena's spot – who remembers that score?), but what's really on show here are Miyazaki's beautiful vistas, intriguing ways of looking at things, memorable quirky characters, and fanciful storytelling. This is a director who tells us that a couple is falling in love by having them fly paper airplanes to one another from the ground to a third-story window. The planes in flight are breathtaking, and the film itself becomes about what it is like to love something, to dedicate your life to something only to have it destroyed by something else (the military, illness). This is beautiful stuff and is easily my favorite in the Animated Feature category, not that that means it's going to win; it hasn't a prayer.
Will Win: N/A
Could Win:N/A
My Rating: #21 out of 82

Ernest et Célestine (Ernest & Celestine)
1 Nomination
  • Animated Feature
Cast: Lambert Wilson, Pauline Brunner, Dominique Maurin, Anne-Marie Loop

I don't get to see this before the Academy Awards, and my bet is that most people won't have seen it. It, frankly, looks adorable, and captures the look of the children's books on which it is based (the books are by Gabrielle Vincent and you can see them – some are even translated into English – here). French animation has soared in this category recently, and it has become a safe bet for a nomination almost every single year, though (it would appear) not for the win. Films like Une Vie de Chat, Persepolis, and Sylvain Chomet's superb L'Illusionniste and Les Triplettes de Belleville have all gotten nominations, but none has gone on to the win (despite L'Illusionniste's superiority to almost all of the films – animated or not – that were released in 2010). Ernest et Célestine is released in the U.S. today, so if you live in a city bigger than mine you may have better luck than I catching this picture. 
Will Win: N/A
Could Win: N/A
My Rating: Not ranked

The Croods
1 Nomination
  • Animated Feature
Cast:Nicolas Cage, Emma Stone, Ryan Reynolds, Catherine Keener, Cloris Leachman

I liked this film more than most of my friends did, and I liked it mostly for the kinds of lovely visuals you can see in the image above. The Croods is a silly little story, with characters who are, for the most part, unattractive (they are cro-magnons, after all). The plot covers a family who are running away from the splitting of the supercontinent Pangaea. It is, more importantly a story of learning new things – adapting to new technologies and new ideas. It is about parents learning to listen to their kids and kids learning to listen to their parents. In the ideology of this film, the parents don't know the best way to do things, but they have much bigger hearts than the children. All of this is sort of sweet, and the tone is tongue-in-cheek enough that it didn't make me groan too heavily at any point. And then there is the art design! It is gorgeous. There are millions of bizarre little creatures and plants that look like something out of a prettified Hieronymus Bosch or Pieter Bruegel painting. The Croods is worth watching for these inventive visuals alone.
Will Win: N/A
Could Win: N/A
My Rating: #60 out of 82

25 February 2014

Oscar Nominees 2014: Part 12 of 14


Avant Que de Tout Perdre (Just before Losing Everything)
1 Nomination
  • Live-action Short Film
Director: Xavier Legrand
Cast: Léa Drucker, Anne Benoît, Miljan Chatelain, Mathilde Auneveux, Denis Ménochet, Claire Dumas, Stéphane Shoukroun

This is probably the longest of the short films in this group, and it is my favorite. Which is not to say that it is going to win because I rather imagine that it won't, but this is superb filmmaking. The (very handsome) Xavier Legrand is known primarily as an actor, but he has crafted an elegant little mystery that shifts very quickly from a confusing series of images to a taut and dangerous thriller. Excellent.
Will Win: N/A
Could Win: Live-action Short Film
My Rating: Not ranked

Helium
1 Nomination
  • Live-action Short Film
Director: Anders Walter
Cast: Casper Crump, Pelle Falk Krusbæk, Marijana Janković

This is the sure-fire winner of the Oscar as far as I can tell. It is a beautiful crowd-pleaser of a feature that has two things the Academy loves: storytelling and sick children. This story seemed a little worn out to my mind, but I don't think this will hamper its award chances. Helium boasts some gorgeously designed fantasy sequences and some rather beautiful acting from the young Pelle Falk Krusbæk. And, to top it all off, the film's final shot is a heartbreaking stroke of genius.
Will Win: Live-action Short Film
Could Win: N/A
My Rating: Not ranked

The Voorman Problem
1 Nomination
  • Live-action Short Film
Director: Mark Gill
Cast: Martin Freeman, Tom Hollander, Elisabeth Gray, Simon Griffiths

This is quirky and cute but not much more than that. I think it is supposed to be a thing where we question reality or something like that, but I just ended up thinking it was like a story two dudes come up with on a weekend. I don't mean to denigrate it; it's just that there really isn't much to this picture. It is about god, I suppose, or our arrogance about our place in the world. Or maybe it is about Belgium... not really my thing.
Will Win: N/A
Could Win: N/A
My Rating: Not ranked

Aquel No Era Yo (That Wasn't Me)
1 Nomination
  • Live-action Short Film
Director: Esteban Crespo
Cast: Alejandra Lorente, Juan Tojaka, Babou Cham, Gustavo Salmerón, Alita Rodgers Jr., Mariano Nguema

This film is about child soldiers somewhere in Africa, but the film doesn't really have much going for it. It is a kind of white-savior movie about Spanish people who kidnap child soldiers and take them to safety. But they get caught doing this and are (mostly) killed. War Witch treated this very interesting subject matter with much more nuance and style than this short film can, but more importantly than that, I am not sure what this film is trying to say at all. That forcing children to wield weapons and murder others is bad? I mean, yes, but who would disagree?
Will Win: N/A
Could Win: N/A
My Rating: Not ranked

Pitääkö Mun Kaikki Hoitaa?
(Do I Have to Take Care of Everything?)
1 Nomination
  • Live-action Short Film
Director: Selma Vilhunen
Cast: Joanna Haartti, Santtu Karvonen, Ranja Omaheimo, Ella Toivoniem

This is delightfully funny and a refreshing change of pace from the mostly serious other nominees. Vilhunen's film is about a couple who is late for a wedding and has lost the gift and whose children have nothing to wear. It is a madcap bit of silliness and it is delightful, particularly when Joanna Haartti's heel turns and she drops their makeshift gift (which is a hideous plant) and falls to the ground. Fun stuff.
Will Win: N/A
Could Win: N/A
My Rating: Not ranked

21 February 2014

Oscar Nominees 2014: Part 11 of 14


Bad Grandpa
1 Nomination
  • Makeup
Director: Jeff Tremaine
Cast: Johnny Knoxville, Jackson Nicoll, Georgina Cates, Jill Kill, Greg Harris, Spike Jonze, Catherine Keener

Because the makeup and hairstyling branch releases a shortlist of possible nominees before the actual nominees are named, everybody knew that this film would be a contender for Best Makeup. And the makeup branch does its own thing; nearly every year it nominates terrible films for Oscars, so that we can say the Oscar-nominated film The Wolfman or Norbit or Click or The Time Machine. It isn't even that old of a category, naming three nominees regularly only since 1985. Still it isn't the least respected category in the Academy (we'll get to that one) and they produce plenty of cool nominees in addition to their stinkers – films like The Fly, Beetlejuice, Dracula, Shadow of a Vampire, The Cell, Hoffa, Batman Returns, and The Adventures of Baron Munchhausen were nominated in precious few other categories, but they got makeup nominations. That is a lot of prologue to say that, well, Bad Grandpa isn't a bad movie. In fact, it is quite hilarious, and the makeup is truly excellent, fooling not only movie audiences but people in the same room with the actors who were covered in makeup. I don't really think it can win against the Best-picture-nominated Dallas Buyers Club, but it ought to.
Will Win: N/A
Could Win: Makeup
My Rating: #38 out of 81

The children are so sad they didn't get nominated.
Alone yet Not Alone
1 Nomination
  • Original Song: Bruce Broughton (Silverado)
Director: Ray Brengston, George D. Escobar
Cast: Kelly Greyson, Hayley Lovitt, Clay Walker, Jenn Gotzon, Ozzie Torres, Tony Wade, Joseph Gray, Joanie Stewart, Robert Piece, Natalie Racoosin, Cassie Brennan

As a poster somewhere else put it: Alone yet Not Alone was nominated yet not nominated. This film that no one had ever heard of before got a surprise Best Original Song nomination on January 21st, but it since been deemed ineligible because of ethics violations in its advertising. You can read the Academy's statement about the situation here. Basically what happened is that Broughton, who is an executive member of the music branch and has served on the board of Governors for eighteen years sent out emails to everyone in the music branch drawing their attention to the fact that he had written one of the songs eligible for nomination, blatantly using his influence to get his own song nominated over other contenders (including songs from The Great Gatsby, The Croods, Monsters University, The Butler, Austenland, The Hobbit #2, etc.). Many people were hoping for surprise nominations here – imagine the song "Amen" from All Is Lost getting a nomination or the excellent "So You Know What It's Like" from Short Term 12. My point is that a song nomination could mean a lot, especially for musical films like The Sapphires or Black Nativity. The Academy is not naming a replacement nominee for this category, and they really ought to have done so, it seems to me, just for the sake of fairness. (You can read Broughton's own David-and-Goliath take on the situation here.) Broughton besmirched an already embarrassing category even further with his stunt, and the decision to rescind but not replace simply seems like the Academy wants to live with the stain.
Will Win: N/A
Could Win: N/A
My Rating: Not ranked

Mandela: Long Walk to Freedom
1 Nomination
  • Original Song: Bono (Gangs of New York) & Adam Clayton (Gangs of New York) & The Edge (Gangs of New York) & Larry Mullen (Gangs of New York)
Director: Justin Chadwick
Cast: Idris Elba, Naomie Harris, Tony Kgoroge, Riaad Moosa, Zolani Mkiva, Simo Mogwaza, Fana Mokoena, Thapelo Mokoena, Jamie Bartlett, Deon Lotz, Terry Pheto

This is weird. Not because U2 was nominated for its second Oscar – that was sort of expected – but I guess because the song doesn't seem related in any way to the rest of the music in the film, most conspicuously Alex Heffes' score. The song plays over the end credits, like many Oscar-nominated tunes, so that is fine, but I guess I just felt as though it had nothing to do with the movie. Anyway, the Academy will have U2 perform at the Oscars now, and Harvey Weinstein is a mastermind for making all of that happen. The thing is: if Mandela as a film is not that interesting (and it, quite frankly, goes on forever), it still does seem odd that the only people honored for the movie were not involved in its production and simply wrote a song that was tacked onto the film's end credits. Also, I am just not that into this tune. (And I actually like the U2 song for Gangs of New York.)
Will Win: N/A
Could Win: N/A
My Rating: #59 out of 81